It is easy for the parliamentary democracy to fall dictatorial.
It is a dictatorial principle when choosing a monocrat as a reader.
To the dictatorial prevention, it should aim at a direct-democracy by a net.
In a direct-democracy, all persons are the politicians.
Originally, is the free economy the democracy?
China introduced the free economy under a socialist regime.
In other words, did China become the democracy?
Japan does the economy oppositely in the Liberal Democratic Party dictatorship in huge scattering in the control ( socialism ).
Moreover, Japan of the pacifism is putting the power in the defensive strength reinforcement.
This is a dictatorial principle, road of the militarism.
A reader has 2 kinds.
It is the head of the democracy and reader of a dictatorial principle.
Because the leadership ( dictatorship ) can advance, a dictatorial principle is quick to make a decision.
Even if a situation changes because it has good reasons to have decided in its arrangement, it doesn't backtrack repeatedly.
As a result, it heads for the direction that the people don't intend.
Because the democracy follows the national consensus, it changes with the times and backtracks repeatedly.
Drawing a conclusion takes time.
However, it is good.
The reader of the democracy had better do nothing.
It is the democracy that the individual people act with the independence in the self-responsibility.
The world became one in the global economy.
All human races are the friends.
The politics of each country is the small existence.
A democratization movement is outdated.
The free economy is the democracy.
They are the times that move the politics at an economic power.
That example of success is Huawei and Ali Baba.
Both an American dream and Chinese dream were born in the free economy.
When a government participates oppositely, a private free idea is lost and is the road of a decline.
